Ordinary Families, Special Children, 3rd edition

Ordinary Families, Special Children, 3rd edition

Milton Seligman and Rosalyn Benjamin Darling
This book examines the needs and concerns of families raising children with special needs from infancy to adulthood. Blending research findings, candid discussions and case examples, this is a very readable textbook for college students and clinicians.
Item: OFSC
Price: $35.00
Quantity Add to wish list

Full Description

Now in a revised and expanded third edition, this popular clinical reference and text provides a multi-systems perspective on childhood disability and its effects on family life. It examines how child, family, ecological, and socio-cultural variables intertwine to shape the ways that families respond to a child’s disability. Information for clinicians and educators show how to promote coping, adaptation, and empowerment among families. Although written as a textbook, it reads as an integrated body of theory and research filled with personal vignettes and firsthand reflections from family members.

New in the Third Edition:

  • Updated with current research, counseling approaches, and resources
  • New chapter on the challenges and opportunities of adulthood
  • Expanded coverage of disability pride, family diversity, and the role of fathers
Details
Item OFSC
ISBN# 1-59385-362-9
Pages 434 pages, 6 x 9, hardcover
Year 2007 ~ third edition

Authors

Milton Seligman, PhD, is Professor Emeritus in the Department of Psychology in Education at the University of Pittsburgh. His chief academic interest is in the area of childhood disability and the family. Other areas of instruction and scholarship include individual and group psychotherapy and clinical supervision. Retired since 2004, Dr. Seligman maintains his private practice, serves on the editorial board for the Journal for Specialists in Group Work, and is currently writing a book for parents on childhood disability and the family. He lives in Pittsburgh with his wife.

Rosalyn Benjamin Darling, PhD, is Professor of Sociology at Indiana University of Pennsylvania, where she has taught since 1994. Prior to assuming her academic position, she served for 15 years as the executive director of an agency serving young children with disabilities and their families and was the founder and first president of the Early Intervention Providers Association of Pennsylvania. Dr. Darling has authored or coauthored eight books and numerous articles and chapters on disability and human services. She has played an active role in many state- and national-level disability-related organizations and committees and is currently engaged in research on orientations toward disability.

Contents

I. Conceptual Framework
1. Introduction and Conceptual Framework I: Social and Cultural Systems
2. Conceptual Framework II: Family Systems Theory and Childhood Disability
3. All Families Are Not Alike: Social and Cultural Diversity in Reaction to Childhood Disability

II. The Family Life Cycle
4. Becoming the Parent of a Child with a Disability: Reactions to First Information
5. Childhood: Continuing Adaptation
6. Looking to the Future: Adolescence and Adulthood

III. The Family System
7. Effects on the Family as a System
8. Effects on Fathers
9. Effects on Siblings
10. Effects on Grandparents

IV. Approaches to Intervention
11. Professional-Family Interaction: Working toward Partnership
12. Perspectives and Approaches for Working with Families
13. Applying a Partnership Approach to Identifying Family Resources, Concerns, and Priorities: Developing Family Service Plans

Excerpts

Sample excerpt. Preview only – please do not copy.

To put the magnitude of extant disability in the U.S. population into perspective, the year 2000 disability status report from the U.S. Bureau of the Census counted 49.7 million people with a chronic illness or disability. This figure accounted for 19.3% of the U.S. noninstitutionalized population ages 5 and older—or nearly one person in five (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2003a). These figures do not include infants and children from birth to 5 years of age. Among the population from 5 to 15, about 2.6 million, or 5.8%, had disabilities, with boys representing a larger proportion of the total than girls. Overall, 5.2 million children and teenagers—one out of every 12—have a physical or mental disability. These numbers represent an increase over those in data collected previously. In addition, in this population, disabilities are more common among Native Americans and African Americans than among European and Asian Americans. According to Schonberg and Tifft (2002) and Batshaw (2002), 3–5% of births result in a congenital disability or genetic disorder.

Childhood disabilities range from high-incidence impairments to those that are less frequent in the population. High-incidence impairments in persons 6–21 make up 92% of impairments overall, including specific learning disabilities, speech or language impairments, intellectual disability, and serious emotional disturbance (U.S. Department of Education, 1996; Hunt & Marshall, 1999). Lower-incidence impairments, which for each condition constitute less than 2%, include multiple disabilities, hearing impairments, orthopedic impairments, other health impairments, visual impairments, autism, deafness–blindness, and traumatic brain injury. Furthermore, more than 6.3 million children and youth, ages 3–21, received special education services during the school year (U.S. Department of Education, 2002).

We suspect that these statistics provide a meaningful yet incomplete picture of the portion of the U.S. population that has a disability. In accumulating data from various sources, one should be mindful that there are differences in definitions of what constitutes a disability, differences in how data on multiple conditions are determined and counted, sampling method differences, and decisions that are made about when certain age groups are included/excluded (Olkin, 1999; Shapiro, 1994). This concern does not diminish the validity of the reported figures, but it does suggest that there may be even more people with disabilities than the figures indicate. These numbers indicate that persons with disabilities constitute the largest minority group in the United States (Olkin, 1999), and one that anyone can join at any time as a consequence of illness or accident. Actually, less than 15% of people with disabilities were born with their disability (Shapiro, 1994).

Dramatic improvements in medicine have benefited the existing population of infants, children, youth, and adults with disabilities. Enhanced methods of assessment and diagnosis, along with a greater awareness of symptoms by informed family members have increased the early identification and remediation of disabling conditions. By keeping people alive, and by keeping them alive longer, medicine has contributed to a disability population explosion (Shapiro, 1994). Such medical discoveries as chemotherapy for cancer, insulin for diabetes, and the methods to sustain low-birth-weight infants have kept people with impairments alive and functioning, yet often with disabilities.

Social change has not kept pace with clinical progress. People with disabilities remain at a disadvantage in relation to those without them in virtually every area of life. These individuals are much more likely to be unemployed, to live in poverty, and to remain at home rather than attending social functions. In addition, only 34% of those with disabilities say they are very satisfied with their lives, compared with 61% of those without disabilities (National Organization on Disability/Harris Survey of Americans with Disabilities, 2000). Children with disabilities also experience disadvantages in comparison with their nondisabled peers. For example, they are about twice or three times as likely as other children to be abused or neglected (National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect [NCCAN], 2004). Eliminating such disadvantages requires societal-level changes to remove the structural and attitudinal barriers still faced by people with disabilities. Such interventions are often beyond the scope of professionals working with families on a one-to-one basis. Nevertheless, these professionals need to be aware of the effects of socially constructed barriers on the families they serve.

Send to friend

: *
: *
: *